
In France they discussed the French Open, because it was going on while I was there, and it was in France. In Italy they discussed football, because Italy happens to be the Fifa 2006 Champs, and who doesn't enjoy gloating for four years. In Denmark, everyone was just really happy, and enjoyed life because Denmark is the happiest place in the world. This is no joke either, according to BBC News Denmark is in fact the happiest place in the world.
Anyway, the things that social groups banter about is a function of space and time. That is what made me pay close attention to this pretty meaningless discussion that I overheard some buddies of mine having.
My American friends were arguing about the prospects of having a baseball lineup made up completely of cereals. It is quite amusing when you think about it. You have Snap leading off, followed by Tony The Tiger, and of course, Lucky the Leprechaun from Lucky Charms batting cleanup. There are hundreds of cereals to choose from. It's quite amazing how much choice there is in deciding upon cereal.
I thought the idea was quite a laugh. The thing that caught my ear when overhearing this was the fact that baseball was being discussed, and they certainly didn't talk about that in Europe (at least not the people I met).
When I saw my friends around me getting completely engrossed with the concept of a cereal baseball lineup, I asked myself, if my friends find this worthwhile enough to think about, discuss, argue, then surely lots of people would like to think about the same kind of topic.

If anything, I'd like to hear your ideas as to the practical nature of this concept.
But why even consider the concept unless there is a sizable demographic who would enjoy this sort of debate? Well, after some research, I found out that there are actually a lot of people who would enjoy discussing this.
However, after talking with one of my other friends, he made the comment that the only people who would enjoy debating this issue of a baseball cereal lineup are those who are "high." Whether he was joking or not, I agree with his statement. This is somewhat of a ridiculous conversation to have, so when I found the demographic, I worked those numbers in as well.
- Demographics for Marijuana Smoking, Baseball Liking, Cereal Eating, Debaters

Alright great. Next, I need to determine what portion of these people are likely to smoke marijuana. According to US Department of Health and Human Services, 97 million Americans, "admit to having tried [marijuana]." Furthermore, according to the CIA, the estimated population of America in 2007 was 301,139,947. Thus, by taking these two figures, we can make a simple proportion that will describe the percentage of Americans who smoke marijuana, overall. So, 97 million divided by 301,139,947 is equal to 32.2%. I was quite surprised to see how high this percentage actually was.
So, if we assume that our sample of baseball fans are generally similar to the entire US population, we can take 32.2% of the total fans to essentially find out how many baseball fans smoke marijuana. This equation looks like this: 0.322(60,767,334). This function equals 19,573,728 baseball fans that smoke marijuana.
The final step is to determine how many people enjoy eating cereal for breakfast and finally apply this proportion to our prior total to arrive at marijuana smoking, baseball loving, cereal eaters.

In order to figure out this total, we have to first divide our total baseball fans that smoke marijuana by two (2). This is because we assume that there is an equal amount of men and women in the sample. This means that we have two groups of 9,786,864 baseball fans that smoke marijuana, one male and one female.
If we assume that our cereal eating survey is generally representative of America, we apply the percentages to the two groups to arrive at our final conclusions.
- 0.35(9,786,864 females) = 3,425,402 cereal eating females that like baseball and smoke marijuana
- 0.27(9,786,864 males) = 2,642,453 cereal eating males that like baseball and smoke marijuana
- Conclusion
That's a significant total when you consider how random these three cross sections of America are. After performing these calculations, it further motivates me to find the next great idea, because, apparently, no matter what it is...there's a market for it.
2 comments:
Such an entertaining, creative post. And I LOVE your conclusion... so true. You must read Microtrends.
Mark's comment about "blah" ideas usually lending themselves to commercialization is interesting. I'd be curious to understand that further...
Post a Comment